Our philosophy is that the best way to have a sound salary structure is to review salaries regularly and make needed adjustments or small increases on a consistent basis.
Some citizens believe that the state's elected officials are overpaid. This may, in part, be due to the fact that the salaries of other public officials in the state are rarely in the news, making it difficult for the public to compare those salaries.
We believe that it is important to keep state elected officials' salaries in line with other public officials' salaries in the state.
Perhaps our greatest responsibility, as well as the decision involving the largest number of officials and total dollars, is to maintain adequate salaries to attract and retain competent judges. Data and testimony presented to us indicates not only that judges earn less than a large percentage of private-sector attorneys from whose ranks most of them come as well as less than some public sector attorneys. And in recent years a number of experienced judges have left the bench to work in private arbitration and mediation firms where they can make much more money. Although private sector compensation levels are not practical, our increases helps maintain relative salary levels and encourages experienced judges to remain in public service. Our judicial system has a reputation for integrity, and realistic salaries are one factor helping to maintain that integrity. We have heard persuasive testimony from the Judiciary as well as the findings of a consultant report that the most appropriate bench mark for the state's judiciary is the Federal bench.
Each volunteer, citizen salary commissioner puts in many hours of service to reach thoughtful, non-political conclusions that serve the public by setting salaries that reflect the duties of the job and attract and retain high quality people in public service.